IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v7y1999i1p21-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing Hospice Projects: a review of governance, leadership, and management as seen in the foundation of the modern hospice movement

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Johnson

Abstract

This article reviews findings from a study of corporate vision in hospice foundation in Britain. Evidence was obtained from 77 different independent charitable hospices about their founding groups, and the projects they carried out. The identified qualities of successful corporate visions are reported. The typical hospice is a very substantial charity organisation, representing a major achievement in both fund‐raising and management terms. The groups who founded these hospices are shown to number 12 members on average, a significant difference from management groups in businesses. Groups also show striking consistencies in the professions represented, indicating a conscious and deliberate approach to recruitment. Social workers and administrators seem to have been under‐represented, leading to later weaknesses in many organisations. An informal delegation of decision‐making authority is evident, and very few decisions are recorded in committee minutes. Even fewer were division votes, which usually resulted in resignations of members. Patterns of leadership are explored, and it is shown that conventional assumptions about the need for charismatic leaders to maintain these projects are false. The leadership of these projects appears to reside in the maintenance of the original corporate vision. It is also shown that these organisations recognise authorities or influences that do not appear in their formal or legal structure, and this is a feature of institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Johnson, 1999. "Governing Hospice Projects: a review of governance, leadership, and management as seen in the foundation of the modern hospice movement," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 21-30, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:7:y:1999:i:1:p:21-30
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8683.00125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00125
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8683.00125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:7:y:1999:i:1:p:21-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.