IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v5y1997i2p87-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Directors’ Core Competencies – the Case of the Mass Transit Railway Corporation, Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • R.I. (Bob) Tricker
  • Kelly Lee

Abstract

In 1993 the Executive Board of the Mass Transit Railway Corporation (MTRC) in Hong Kong approved the implementation of a corporate wide manpower and succession planning process. Succession at executive director level was identified as a priority. It was recognised that it would be necessary to identify and assess skills appropriate to company ‘direction’ as distinct from ‘management’ in order to proceed with succession planning at director level and to identify director training and development needs. Two crucial questions emerged: was it possible to identify the core competencies that are required by executive directors? If so, could those competencies be measured and assessed objectively? The experiences of the MTRC in identifying director competencies and in designing, validating and implementing the assessment process during 1994 and 1995 suggests that they can. Their experience forms the basis of this paper. The relatively sparse literature on the identification of director‐level competencies is discussed. The competencies identified by the MTRC are outlined. The development of assessment centres, which are widely used to assess core competencies in managerial and professional roles, is then explained. Finally, the experience of the MTRC in extending the use of assessment centres to appraise board‐level governance rather than managerial competencies is described and conclusions drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • R.I. (Bob) Tricker & Kelly Lee, 1997. "Assessing Directors’ Core Competencies – the Case of the Mass Transit Railway Corporation, Hong Kong," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 87-101, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:5:y:1997:i:2:p:87-101
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8683.00048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8683.00048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:5:y:1997:i:2:p:87-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.