IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i2p1129-1143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why do (some) German car manufacturers go electric? The role of dynamic capabilities and cognitive frames

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Loder
  • Adrian Rinscheid
  • Rolf Wüstenhagen

Abstract

After the internal combustion engine was the dominant technology in the automotive industry for more than a century, a transition to electric cars is now under way. However, not all car manufacturers seem equally determined to move away from fossil fuels. Based on a comparative case study of German automakers, we discuss some underlying factors associated with variation in electrification strategies. Conceptually, we focus on firms' dynamic capabilities—in particular, their ability to sense low‐carbon risks and opportunities in a changing business environment. Building on qualitative interviews, we gauge sensing capabilities through industry executives' cognitive frames. Our analysis reveals striking differences in the way executives perceive the opportunities and risks associated with electric mobility. In particular, firms' dynamic capabilities to shape the low‐carbon transition are tied to their conceptions of consumer preferences and the economics of the transition, their perception of network embeddedness, prior experiences with technological innovation, and leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Loder & Adrian Rinscheid & Rolf Wüstenhagen, 2024. "Why do (some) German car manufacturers go electric? The role of dynamic capabilities and cognitive frames," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1129-1143, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:2:p:1129-1143
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3538
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:2:p:1129-1143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.