IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v75y2019i3p1009-1016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A two‐stage experimental design for dilution assays

Author

Listed:
  • Jake M. Ferguson
  • Tanya A. Miura
  • Craig R. Miller

Abstract

Dilution assays to determine solute concentration have found wide use in biomedical research. Many dilution assays return imprecise concentration estimates because they are only done to orders of magnitude. Previous statistical work has focused on how to design efficient experiments that can return more precise estimates, however this work has not considered the practical difficulties of implementing these designs in the laboratory. We developed a two‐stage experiment with a first stage that obtains an order of magnitude estimate and a second stage that concentrates effort on the most informative dilution to increase estimator precision. We show using simulations and an empirical example that the best two‐stage experimental designs yield estimates that are remarkably more accurate than standard methods with equivalent effort. This work demonstrates how to utilize previous advances in experimental design in a manner consistent with current laboratory practice. We expect that multi‐stage designs will prove to be useful for obtaining precise estimates with minimal experimental effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Jake M. Ferguson & Tanya A. Miura & Craig R. Miller, 2019. "A two‐stage experimental design for dilution assays," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(3), pages 1009-1016, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:3:p:1009-1016
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13032
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:3:p:1009-1016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.