IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v74y2018i1p321-330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the probability of clonal relatedness of pairs of tumors in cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Audrey Mauguen
  • Venkatraman E. Seshan
  • Irina Ostrovnaya
  • Colin B. Begg

Abstract

Next generation sequencing panels are being used increasingly in cancer research to study tumor evolution. A specific statistical challenge is to compare the mutational profiles in different tumors from a patient to determine the strength of evidence that the tumors are clonally related, that is, derived from a single, founder clonal cell. The presence of identical mutations in each tumor provides evidence of clonal relatedness, although the strength of evidence from a match is related to how commonly the mutation is seen in the tumor type under investigation. This evidence must be weighed against the evidence in favor of independent tumors from non†matching mutations. In this article, we frame this challenge in the context of diagnosis using a novel random effects model. In this way, by analyzing a set of tumor pairs, we can estimate the proportion of cases that are clonally related in the sample as well as the individual diagnostic probabilities for each case. The method is illustrated using data from a study to determine the clonal relationship of lobular carcinoma in situ with subsequent invasive breast cancers, where each tumor in the pair was subjected to whole exome sequencing. The statistical properties of the method are evaluated using simulations, demonstrating that the key model parameters are estimated with only modest bias in small samples in most configurations.

Suggested Citation

  • Audrey Mauguen & Venkatraman E. Seshan & Irina Ostrovnaya & Colin B. Begg, 2018. "Estimating the probability of clonal relatedness of pairs of tumors in cancer patients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 321-330, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:1:p:321-330
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12710
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12710?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin B. Begg & Kevin H. Eng & Amanda J. Hummer, 2007. "Statistical Tests for Clonality," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 522-530, June.
    2. K. F. Lam & Hongqi Xue & Yin Bun Cheung, 2006. "Semiparametric Analysis of Zero-Inflated Count Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 996-1003, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Das, Ujjwal & Das, Kalyan, 2018. "Inference on zero inflated ordinal models with semiparametric link," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 104-115.
    2. Irina Ostrovnaya & Audrey Mauguen & Venkatraman E. Seshan & Colin B. Begg, 2021. "Testing tumors from different anatomic sites for clonal relatedness using somatic mutation data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 283-292, March.
    3. Tousifur Rahman & Partha Jyoti Hazarika & M. Masoom Ali & Manash Pratim Barman, 2022. "Three-Inflated Poisson Distribution and its Application in Suicide Cases of India During Covid-19 Pandemic," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 1103-1127, October.
    4. He, Xuming & Xue, Hongqi & Shi, Ning-Zhong, 2010. "Sieve maximum likelihood estimation for doubly semiparametric zero-inflated Poisson models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(9), pages 2026-2038, October.
    5. Feng, Jiarui & Zhu, Zhongyi, 2011. "Semiparametric analysis of longitudinal zero-inflated count data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 61-72, January.
    6. Ostrovnaya Irina, 2012. "Testing clonality of three and more tumors using their loss of heterozygosity profiles," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-30, July.
    7. Irina Ostrovnaya & Venkatraman E. Seshan & Colin B. Begg, 2008. "Comparison of Properties of Tests for Assessing Tumor Clonality," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1018-1022, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:1:p:321-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.