IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v71y2015i3p859-5632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rejoinder to “A note on the empirical likelihood confidence band for hazards ratio with covariate adjustment”

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Dong
  • David Matthews

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Dong & David Matthews, 2015. "Rejoinder to “A note on the empirical likelihood confidence band for hazards ratio with covariate adjustment”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 859-563, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:71:y:2015:i:3:p:859-563:2
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12327
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shihong Zhu & Yifan Yang & Mai Zhou, 2015. "A note on the empirical likelihood confidence band for hazards ratio with covariate adjustment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 859-563, September.
    2. Bin Dong & David Matthews, 2015. "Rejoinder to “A note on the empirical likelihood confidence band for hazards ratio with covariate adjustment”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 859-563, September.
    3. Bin Dong & David E. Matthews, 2012. "Empirical Likelihood for Cumulative Hazard Ratio Estimation with Covariate Adjustment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 408-418, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Mai & Zhu, Shihong, 2015. "Empirical likelihood confidence band for the difference of survival functions under proportional hazards model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 228-235.
    2. Zhao, Meng & Zhao, Yichuan & McKeague, Ian W., 2015. "Empirical likelihood inference for the odds ratio of two survival functions under right censoring," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 304-312.
    3. Shihong Zhu & Yifan Yang & Mai Zhou, 2015. "A note on the empirical likelihood confidence band for hazards ratio with covariate adjustment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 859-563, September.
    4. Bin Dong & David Matthews, 2015. "Rejoinder to “A note on the empirical likelihood confidence band for hazards ratio with covariate adjustment”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 859-563, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:71:y:2015:i:3:p:859-563:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.