IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v64y2008i1p256-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussions

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Sullivan Pepe

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Sullivan Pepe, 2008. "Discussions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 256-258, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:64:y:2008:i:1:p:256-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00781_2.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Huang & Margaret Sullivan Pepe & Ziding Feng, 2007. "Evaluating the Predictiveness of a Continuous Marker," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1181-1188, December.
    2. Jing Qin, 2003. "Using logistic regression procedures for estimating receiver operating characteristic curves," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(3), pages 585-596, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gu Wen & Pepe Margaret, 2009. "Measures to Summarize and Compare the Predictive Capacity of Markers," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-49, October.
    2. Y. Huang & M. S. Pepe, 2009. "A Parametric ROC Model-Based Approach for Evaluating the Predictiveness of Continuous Markers in Case–Control Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1133-1144, December.
    3. William M. Briggs & Russell Zaretzki, 2008. "The Skill Plot: A Graphical Technique for Evaluating Continuous Diagnostic Tests," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 250-256, March.
    4. Luo, Jingqin & Xiong, Chengjie, 2012. "DiagTest3Grp: An R Package for Analyzing Diagnostic Tests with Three Ordinal Groups," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 51(i03).
    5. Cheam, Amay S.M. & McNicholas, Paul D., 2016. "Modelling receiver operating characteristic curves using Gaussian mixtures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 192-208.
    6. B Rey deCastro, 2019. "Cumulative ROC curves for discriminating three or more ordinal outcomes with cutpoints on a shared continuous measurement scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Zhang, Biao, 2006. "A semiparametric hypothesis testing procedure for the ROC curve area under a density ratio model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(7), pages 1855-1876, April.
    8. Jiang, Shan & Tu, Dongsheng, 2012. "Inference on the probability P(T1," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1069-1078.
    9. Janes Holly & Brown Marshall D. & Huang Ying & Pepe Margaret S., 2014. "An Approach to Evaluating and Comparing Biomarkers for Patient Treatment Selection," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Tianxi Cai & Thomas A Gerds & Yingye Zheng & Jinbo Chen, 2011. "Robust Prediction of t-Year Survival with Data from Multiple Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 436-444, June.
    11. Alicja Jokiel-Rokita & Rafał Topolnicki, 2019. "Minimum distance estimation of the binormal ROC curve," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 2161-2183, December.
    12. Y. Huang & M. S. Pepe, 2010. "Semiparametric methods for evaluating the covariate‐specific predictiveness of continuous markers in matched case–control studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(3), pages 437-456, May.
    13. Yousef, Waleed A. & Kundu, Subrata & Wagner, Robert F., 2009. "Nonparametric estimation of the threshold at an operating point on the ROC curve," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4370-4383, October.
    14. Stuart G. Baker & Nancy R. Cook & Andrew Vickers & Barnett S. Kramer, 2009. "Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(4), pages 729-748, October.
    15. Wang, Suohong & Zhang, Biao, 2014. "Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for AUC under a density ratio model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 101-115.
    16. Alessandra Amendola & Francesco Giordano & Maria Lucia Parrella & Marialuisa Restaino, 2017. "Variable selection in high‐dimensional regression: a nonparametric procedure for business failure prediction," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(4), pages 355-368, August.
    17. Peter B. Gilbert & Michael G. Hudgens, 2008. "Evaluating Candidate Principal Surrogate Endpoints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1146-1154, December.
    18. Wan, Shuwen & Zhang, Biao, 2008. "Comparing correlated ROC curves for continuous diagnostic tests under density ratio models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 233-245, September.
    19. Ying Huang & Eric Laber, 2016. "Personalized Evaluation of Biomarker Value: A Cost-Benefit Perspective," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 8(1), pages 43-65, June.
    20. Zhong Guan & Cheng Peng, 2011. "A rank-based empirical likelihood approach to two-sample proportional odds model and its goodness of fit," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 763-780.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:64:y:2008:i:1:p:256-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.