IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v57y2001i1p232-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Semiautomatic Approaches to Contour Segmentation Applied to Fungal Hyphae

Author

Listed:
  • Iain M. Inglis
  • Alison J. Gray

Abstract

Summary. Semiautomatic image analysis techniques are particularly useful in biological applications, which commonly generate very complex images, and offer considerable flexibility. However, systematic study of such methods is lacking; most research develops fully automatic algorithms. This paper describes a study to evaluate several different semiautomatic or computer‐assisted approaches to contour segmentation within the context of segmenting degraded images of fungal hyphae. Four different types of contour segmentation method, with varying degrees and types of user input, are outlined and applied to hyphal images. The methods are evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively by comparing results obtained by several test subjects segmenting simulated images qualitatively similar to the hyphal images of interest. An active contour model approach, using control points, emerges as the method to be preferred to three more traditional approaches. Feedback from the image provider indicates that any of the methods described have something useful to offer for segmentation of hyphae.

Suggested Citation

  • Iain M. Inglis & Alison J. Gray, 2001. "An Evaluation of Semiautomatic Approaches to Contour Segmentation Applied to Fungal Hyphae," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 232-239, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:57:y:2001:i:1:p:232-239
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00232.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00232.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00232.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:57:y:2001:i:1:p:232-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.