IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/asiaps/v5y2018i3p533-543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privacy concerns in China's smart city campaign: The deficit of China's Cybersecurity Law

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Yang
  • Jian Xu

Abstract

Many cities around the world are increasingly embedding technological infrastructure in urban spaces. These infrastructures aim to collect vast amounts of data from citizens with an apparent purpose of improving public services. This article discusses privacy concerns generated by China's nationwide smart city campaign and further investigates why China's latest Cybersecurity Law is not adequate to address the risks to citizens' privacy. We argue that there is no functional privacy law in China that would apply to most data collected by smart city infrastructure; nor is there any law that would protect any personal data collected under this framework. We therefore propose practical suggestions to better protect citizens' data in China's ongoing smart city campaign.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Yang & Jian Xu, 2018. "Privacy concerns in China's smart city campaign: The deficit of China's Cybersecurity Law," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 533-543, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:5:y:2018:i:3:p:533-543
    DOI: 10.1002/app5.246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.246
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/app5.246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luigi Tomba, 2017. "Gentrifying China's Urbanization? Why Culture and Capital Aren't Enough," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 508-5517, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caprotti, Federico & Liu, Dong, 2020. "Emerging platform urbanism in China: Reconfigurations of data, citizenship and materialities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Justyna Żywiołek & Francesco Schiavone, 2021. "Perception of the Quality of Smart City Solutions as a Sense of Residents’ Safety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Shadi Shayan & Ki Pyung Kim & Tony Ma & Tan Hai Dang Nguyen, 2020. "The First Two Decades of Smart City Research from a Risk Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Jing-jing Zhang & Wei-hua Zeng & Sheng-li Hou & Yu-qi Chen & Lin-yan Guo & Yan-xing Li, 2022. "A low-power and low cost smart streetlight system based on Internet of Things technology," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 83-93, January.
    5. Elvira Ismagilova & Laurie Hughes & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2022. "Security, Privacy and Risks Within Smart Cities: Literature Review and Development of a Smart City Interaction Framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 393-414, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolyn Cartier, 2017. "Contextual Urban Theory and the ‘Appeal’ of Gentrification: Lost in Transposition?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 466-477, May.
    2. Alan Smart & Josephine Smart, 2017. "Ain't Talkin' ‘Bout Gentrification: The Erasure of Alternative Idioms of Displacement Resulting from Anglo-American Academic Hegemony," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 518-525, May.
    3. Chris Hamnett, 2020. "Is Chinese urbanisation unique?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 690-700, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:5:y:2018:i:3:p:533-543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2050-2680 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.