IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/apacel/v33y2019i2p121-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residual government ownership and corporate investment efficiency in privatised firms: evidence from a transition country

Author

Listed:
  • Xuan Vinh Vo

Abstract

This paper delves into the link between residual government ownership and investment efficiency in privatised firms in a transitional economy. The study uses a data set covering firms listed on the Ho Chi Minh City stock exchange, Vietnam, over the period from 2007 to 2015. It is found that firms with higher residual government ownership are associated with lower levels of investment efficiency. The finding suggests that government ownership is less beneficial than private ownership in privatised firms. The paper has important implications for policymakers in supporting privatisation policy and in designing a framework to promote better corporate governance in privatised firms after privatisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuan Vinh Vo, 2019. "Residual government ownership and corporate investment efficiency in privatised firms: evidence from a transition country," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 33(2), pages 121-127, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:33:y:2019:i:2:p:121-127
    DOI: 10.1111/apel.12270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12270
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/apel.12270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Choi, Paul Moon Sub & Chung, Chune Young & Vo, Xuan Vinh & Wang, Kainan, 2020. "Are better-governed firms more innovative? Evidence from Korea," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 263-279.
    2. Thi Lam Anh Nguyen & Xuan Vinh Vo, 2020. "Does corporate governance really matter for bank efficiency? Evidence from ASEAN countries," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(4), pages 681-706, December.
    3. Xiangyu Chen & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Dang Khoa Tran & Waseem Alhaddad & Jinsoo Hwang & Phung Anh Thu, 2020. "Are Socially Responsible Companies Really Ethical? The Moderating Role of State-Owned Enterprises: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Ghazali, Ahmad & Khaw, Karren Lee-Hwei & Zainir, Fauzi Bin, 2022. "Development vs. political views of government ownership: How does it affect investment efficiency?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:33:y:2019:i:2:p:121-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14678411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.