IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/amedoc/v15y1964i3p179-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective information‐searching strategies without “perfect” indexing

Author

Listed:
  • R. J. Tritschler

Abstract

Computer searching of an information file offers significant advantages over manual searching when it can utilize strategies that are impractical for a human searcher to use. This paper examines several existing strategies, and then suggests that increased emphasis be placed on one that is relatively tolerant of “imperfect” indexing. Since “perfect” indexing does not exist, such a strategy would have considerable value. The general procedure consists of counting the number of search‐matched index terms and then calculating a relevance factor for each item found, thus enabling the final search‐output listing to be prepared in order of probable relevance. This technique is essentially the same as the strategy used successfully in such diverse tasks as identifying criminal suspects by their modus operandi, selecting suitable gifts for department store shoppers, and locating misspelled names in an airlines reservation file.

Suggested Citation

  • R. J. Tritschler, 1964. "Effective information‐searching strategies without “perfect” indexing," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 179-184, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:15:y:1964:i:3:p:179-184
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.5090150303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090150303
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.5090150303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:15:y:1964:i:3:p:179-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.