IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v67y2008i3p429-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In the Shadows of Vanity: Religion and the Debate Over Hierarchy

Author

Listed:
  • J. Daniel Hammond

Abstract

. Sandra Peart and David Levy emphasize the role of economists in their excellent history of the debate between philosophers and scientists and economists and evangelicals over race and hierarchy in 19th‐century Britain. Evangelical Christians have a role as allies with economists, and also Jews, but as a racial rather than a religious group. Religion, which has much to say about what it means to be human, remains in the shadows of Peart and Levy's account. The purpose of this paper is to make a start at casting light on the role of religion in the debate over race and hierarchy in 19th‐century England.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Daniel Hammond, 2008. "In the Shadows of Vanity: Religion and the Debate Over Hierarchy," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 429-443, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:67:y:2008:i:3:p:429-443
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00579.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00579.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00579.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:67:y:2008:i:3:p:429-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.