IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajarec/v39y1995i3p289-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comment On Klieve‐Macaulay'S Southern Bluefin Tuna Game

Author

Listed:
  • Phil Simmons
  • Lee Wallace

Abstract

Klieve and MacAulay (1993) (KM) analyse bargaining between the Australian and Japanese Southern Bluefin Tuna (SBT) industries using game theory. The KM model is a Nash equilibrium with symmetrical information, threat functions and a set of biological constraints. When we attempted to include the New Zealand SBT industry as a player in the KM model, we discovered important shortcomings in it. In this comment, we outline three major shortcomings in the KM model and propose an alternative model of a Nash equilibrium for the SBT industry.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Phil Simmons & Lee Wallace, 1995. "A Comment On Klieve‐Macaulay'S Southern Bluefin Tuna Game," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 39(3), pages 289-291, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:39:y:1995:i:3:p:289-291
    DOI: j.1467-8489.1995.tb00555.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-8489.1995.tb00555.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/j.1467-8489.1995.tb00555.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Klieve & T. Gordon MacAulay, 1993. "A Game Theory Analysis Of Management Strategies For The Southern Bluefin Tuna Industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 37(1), pages 17-32, April.
    2. John O.S. Kennedy & James W. Watkins, 1985. "The Impact Of Quotas On The Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 29(1), pages 63-83, April.
    3. Klieve, H. M. & MacAulay, T. Gordon, 1993. "A Game Theory Analysis Of Management Strategies For The Southern Bluefin Tuna Industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 37(1), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben White, 2000. "A Review of the Economics of Biological Natural Resources," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 419-462, September.
    2. Claire Armstrong & Ussif Sumaila, 2000. "Cannibalism and the Optimal Sharing of the North-East Atlantic Cod Stock: a Bioeconomic Model," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 99-115, May.
    3. Jared Greenville & T. Gordon MacAulay, 2006. "Protected areas in fisheries: a two-patch, two-species model ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(2), pages 207-226, June.
    4. Klieve, H. M. & MacAulay, T. Gordon, 1993. "A Game Theory Analysis Of Management Strategies For The Southern Bluefin Tuna Industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 37(1), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Greenville, Jared W. & MacAulay, T. Gordon, 2006. "Protected areas in fisheries: a two-patch, two-species model," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(2), pages 1-20, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:39:y:1995:i:3:p:289-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.