IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v56y2016i2p297-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sarbanes–Oxley Act and patterns in stock returns around executive stock option exercise disclosures

Author

Listed:
  • Eli Bartov
  • Lucile Faurel
  • Steven Cahan

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="acfi12100-abs-0001"> We document negative stock returns and elevated trading volumes around executives’ early option exercise disclosures post-SOX, but not pre-SOX. This stock price reaction is incomplete, and the negative stock price drift is smaller post-SOX compared to pre-SOX. We also show effects of media coverage in the stock price response to exercise disclosures in the post-SOX period. These findings provide evidence that the requirement mandated by SOX to disclose executives’ stock option exercises within two business days, and the increased media coverage, improves investors’ ability to incorporate into stock prices in a timely fashion the information conveyed by these exercises.

Suggested Citation

  • Eli Bartov & Lucile Faurel & Steven Cahan, 2016. "Sarbanes–Oxley Act and patterns in stock returns around executive stock option exercise disclosures," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 56(2), pages 297-332, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:56:y:2016:i:2:p:297-332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/acfi.2016.56.issue-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ron Bird & Peng Huang & Yue Lu, 2018. "Board independence and the variability of firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous regulatory shock," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(1), pages 3-26, February.
    2. Millicent Chang & Andrew B. Jackson & Marvin Wee, 2018. "A review of research on regulation changes in the Asia‐Pacific region," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(3), pages 635-667, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:56:y:2016:i:2:p:297-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.