IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v49y2013i2p197-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Pragmatist Defence of Classical Financial Accounting Research

Author

Listed:
  • Brian A. Rutherford

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian A. Rutherford, 2013. "A Pragmatist Defence of Classical Financial Accounting Research," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(2), pages 197-218, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:49:y:2013:i:2:p:197-218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/abac.12003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hines, Ruth D., 1991. "The FASB's conceptual framework, financial accounting and the maintenance of the social world," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 313-331.
    2. Beattie, Vivien, 2005. "Moving the financial accounting research front forward: the UK contribution," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 85-114.
    3. Holthausen, Robert W. & Watts, Ross L., 2001. "The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 3-75, September.
    4. Unknown, 2005. "Forward," 2005 Conference: Slovenia in the EU - Challenges for Agriculture, Food Science and Rural Affairs, November 10-11, 2005, Moravske Toplice, Slovenia 183804, Slovenian Association of Agricultural Economists (DAES).
    5. Merino, Barbara D., 1993. "An analysis of the development of accounting knowledge: A pragmatic approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 18(2-3), pages 163-185, April.
    6. Chambers, Rj, 1974. "Trial And Error - Reply," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 341-347.
    7. Brian Rutherford, 2010. "The social scientific turn in UK financial accounting research: A philosophical and sociological analysis," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 149-171.
    8. Tinker, Tony, 1991. "The accountant as partisan," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 297-310.
    9. Brian A. Rutherford, 2007. "A Possibilitarian History of Price Change Accounting in the UK: 1971-1985," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 285-312.
    10. Whitley, R. D., 1988. "The possibility and utility of positive accounting theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 631-645, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian Rutherford, 2010. "The social scientific turn in UK financial accounting research: A philosophical and sociological analysis," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 149-171.
    2. Lee Parker, 2007. "Financial and external reporting research: the broadening corporate governance challenge," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 59-61.
    3. Brown, Rhoda & Jones, Michael, 2015. "Mapping and exploring the topography of contemporary financial accounting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 237-261.
    4. Hayoun, Shaul, 2019. "How fair value is both market-based and entity-specific: The irreducibility of value constellations to market prices," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 68-82.
    5. Baker, C. Richard & Wallage, Philip, 2000. "The Future of Financial Reporting in Europe: Its Role in Corporate Governance," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 173-187, July.
    6. Philip D. Palmer, 2008. "Disclosure of the impacts of adopting Australian equivalents of International Financial Reporting Standards," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(5), pages 847-870, December.
    7. Bayou, Mohamed E. & Reinstein, Alan & Williams, Paul F., 2011. "To tell the truth: A discussion of issues concerning truth and ethics in accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 109-124, February.
    8. Tejedo Romero, Francisca & Alfaro Cortés, Esteban, 2014. "Asociación entre las características empresariales y la divulgación sobre Capital Intelectual: un estudio de las empresas del Ibex 35/Association between Business Characteristics and Intellectual Capi," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 32, pages 371-398, Enero.
    9. Alberto Quagli & Francesco Avallone & Paola Ramassa, 2016. "The Real Impact Factor and the Gap between Accounting Research and Practice," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 29-57.
    10. Brown, Judy, 2009. "Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 313-342.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3828 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Mouck, Tom, 2004. "Institutional reality, financial reporting and the rules of the game," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(5-6), pages 525-541.
    13. Bonsón, Enrique & Bednárová, Michaela, 2015. "CSR reporting practices of Eurozone companies," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 182-193.
    14. K. Vithana & T. Soobaroyen & C. G. Ntim, 2021. "Human Resource Disclosures in UK Corporate Annual Reports: To What Extent Do These Reflect Organisational Priorities Towards Labour?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 475-497, March.
    15. Stefano Fontana & Daniela Coluccia & Silvia Solimene, 2019. "VAIC as a Tool for Measuring Intangibles Value in Voluntary Multi-Stakeholder Disclosure," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(4), pages 1679-1699, December.
    16. Erb, Carsten & Pelger, Christoph, 2015. "“Twisting words”? A study of the construction and reconstruction of reliability in financial reporting standard-setting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 13-40.
    17. Wakefield, Robin, 2008. "Networks of accounting research: A citation-based structural and network analysis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 228-244.
    18. Brooks, Chris & Fenton, Evelyn & Schopohl, Lisa & Walker, James, 2019. "Why does research in finance have so little impact?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 24-52.
    19. Murphy, Tim & O’Connell, Vincent, 2017. "Challenging the dominance of formalism in accounting education: An analysis of the potential of stewardship in light of the evolution of legal education," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-29.
    20. Akbar, Saeed & Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali & Stark, Andrew W., 2011. "The value relevance of cash flows, current accruals, and non-current accruals in the UK," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 311-319.
    21. Kam Chan & Carl Chen & Louis Cheng, 2006. "A ranking of accounting research output in the European region," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 3-17.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:49:y:2013:i:2:p:197-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.