IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/2368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Environmental Implications of Clothing Maintenance Among Consumers in Gauteng Province, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Mastamet-Mason
  • Christina JM More

Abstract

In 2018, global fashion produced 2.1 billion tonnes of greenhouse emissions. According to life-cycle assessments (LCA), the use phase in clothing life cycles is the most harmful to the environment. During the use phase, clothing maintenance is associated with high water and energy consumption and is the most polluting stage in the clothing life cycle. In addressing the environmental impact of the clothing and textile industry, the design and manufacturing phases overshadow the clothing maintenance/care phase. As part of their social responsibility, clothing companies do not concern themselves with how sold garments are utilised after purchase. A disconnect emerges between seller and buyer immediately after a garment is bought and leaves the retail environment. As a result, the clothing consumer assumes full responsibility for managing the environmental impacts that characterise the use phase. Yet, most consumers need to be equipped with the knowledge to empower them to understand the ecological implications. This study aims to establish the level of sustainability awareness among young consumers in a major South African university of technology concerning clothing maintenance and to establish whether environmental knowledge translates into sustainable practice. The study applied a quantitative research approach, using semi-structured questionnaires, to gather information related to the ecological impact of washing, drying, and ironing clothing, as well as washing detergents and fabric softeners. The findings show that most participants were aware of 'eco-fashion' as a general term related to environmental welfare but were unaware of how the activities involved in the care of clothing may affect the environment. Some participants demonstrated poor knowledge, and many did not relate clothing-care equipment and products such as detergents and fabric softeners to adverse environmental impacts. Few participants consulted fabric and care label instructions during laundering and ironing to avoid ecological damage. Most participants also did not understand the health and environmental dangers caused by dry cleaning processes. The research concludes that there is a generally low level of sustainability awareness among young consumers of clothing and a low rate of translation of sustainability literacy into sustainable action in the care and maintenance of clothing. The paper recommends that clothing manufacturers and retailers provide consumers with sustainable post-purchase information as part of their environmental responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Mastamet-Mason & Christina JM More, 2023. "Perceived Environmental Implications of Clothing Maintenance Among Consumers in Gauteng Province, South Africa," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:2368
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/13237
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/13237/12827
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp & Roy Kettlewell & Stephen Wiedemann, 2020. "Laundry Care Regimes: Do the Practices of Keeping Clothes Clean Have Different Environmental Impacts Based on the Fibre Content?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-31, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felice Diekel & Natalia Mikosch & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2021. "Life Cycle Based Comparison of Textile Ecolabels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Ingun Grimstad Klepp & Kirsi Laitala & Stephen Wiedemann, 2020. "Clothing Lifespans: What Should Be Measured and How," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp, 2020. "What Affects Garment Lifespans? International Clothing Practices Based on a Wardrobe Survey in China, Germany, Japan, the UK, and the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-45, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:2368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.