IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/2362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Literature Review on Comparative Study of Request for the Past Ten Years (2012-2022)

Author

Listed:
  • Ming Pang
  • Hazlina Abdul Halim
  • Farhana Muslim Mohd Jalis
  • Wei Hu

Abstract

This systematic literature review attempts to examine the current status, unsolved issues and future trend of the comparative study of request speech act for the past ten years (2012-2022). Based on the analysis of 186 studies, the findings are: 1) the status quo is that intralingual comparative studies of request are still very few and previous researches reply on DCT and CCSARP instruments too much; 2) unsolved issues include further investigation of intralingual comparative request, Asian languages, and the development of new or more advanced instrument; and 3) future trend is that more comparative studies of request need to be conducted on Asian languages, especially Mandarin and Malay from intralingual perspective and new or more advanced data collection and analysis instruments should be applied. This systematic literature review could help identify the research gap and unsolved problems in the current literature that calls for the further investigation of comparative request speech act.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming Pang & Hazlina Abdul Halim & Farhana Muslim Mohd Jalis & Wei Hu, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review on Comparative Study of Request for the Past Ten Years (2012-2022)," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:2362
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/13231
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/13231/12821
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:2362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.