IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjw/socien/v5y2015i1p13-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common errors in writing journals of the English major students at Ho Chi Minh City Open University

Author

Listed:
  • Pham Vu Phi Ho

    (Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam)

  • Pham Ngoc Thuy Duong

    (The National College of Education Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

Abstract

Students’ writing problems are always a primary concern of instructors in writing classrooms, and to know the common errors which frequently occur on students’ writing papers is usually what the writing instructors have conducted in the classrooms. However, no research study has been conducted at the Faculty of Foreign languages at HCMC Open University to investigate into this aspect. The purpose of the current study is to investigate the common written errors on students’ writing journals and to see whether the extensive writing helps enhance students’ writing fluency. 115 first year English-major students participated in this study. They composed five writing journals every week during the course of 15 weeks. Each student composed 62 writing journals in total. The study found that four most common errors frequently occur in students’ writing journals are relating to tenses, collocations, spellings, and verb forms. Also, the current study confirms that the extensive writing practices effect the students’ writing fluency in terms of length of writing. The results of the study help the writing instructors at the local setting with the facts of their students’ writing problems in order to improve the writing practices in the writing classrooms. Particularly, the finding of this study confirms the effects of extensive writing so that the instructors and students could take this issue into their practices beyond the classrooms.

Suggested Citation

  • Pham Vu Phi Ho & Pham Ngoc Thuy Duong, 2015. "Common errors in writing journals of the English major students at Ho Chi Minh City Open University," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 5(1), pages 13-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjw:socien:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:13-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/soci-en/article/view/315/244
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Somchai Watcharapunyawong & Siriluck Usaha, 2013. "Thai EFL Students’ Writing Errors in Different Text Types: The Interference of the First Language," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(1), pages 1-67, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sahar Nasser Alshumaimmeri & Reem Alqarni, 2022. "Teacher and Student Perceptions of CALL Feedback: Synchronous and Asynchronous Teacher Electronic Feedback in EFL-Writing at King Saud University," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(12), pages 114-114, December.
    2. Raveewan Wanchid, 2013. "The Use of Self-Correction, Paper-pencil Peer Feedback and Electronic Peer Feedback in the EFL Writing Class: Opportunities and Challenges," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, November.
    3. Bayatee Dueraman, 2015. "The Crucial Point in Time Where Thai Students Are Introduced English Language Writing," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(9), pages 1-96, September.
    4. Singkham Rakpa, 2022. "Enhancing Thai-English Translation Capabilities of EFL Undergraduates with the Principle of Haujai Nakpraj (Learned-man Approach)," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(8), pages 1-60, December.
    5. Kanyakorn Sermsook & Jiraporn Liamnimitr & Rattaneekorn Pochakorn, 2017. "An Analysis of Errors in Written English Sentences: A Case Study of Thai EFL Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 101-101, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjw:socien:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:13-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vu Tuan Truong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/soci-en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.