IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjw/socien/v14y2024i1p118-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing face-to-face evaluation using alternative optical mark recognition: A case study from the University of Cabuyao’s college of education

Author

Listed:
  • Ronnel Pumares Cuerdo

    (University of Cabuyao, Laguna)

  • Lyra Xyza Llagas Sinfuego

    (DepEd-City Schools Division of Cabuyao, Laguna)

Abstract

Technology is defined as the use of scientific knowledge to solve practical problems. However, educators’ initiatives to integrate technology have been mostly prohibitively expensive. In this context, researchers proposed the automation of one of the most important processes but highly repetitive tasks among educators, the processing of student test results. The aim was to determine the alignment with evaluation standards and the acceptability of a cost-effective alternative. This study utilized a mixed-method approach, specifically concurrent triangulation. Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered concurrently, and then compared and combined the results to get a comprehensive understanding of the topic. Quantitatively, it involved the use of mean, standard deviation, t-test, and Cohen’s d to evaluate Alternative Optical Mark Recognition (AOMR) according to the required educators’ evaluation standards and its impact on reducing educators’ clerical workload. Qualitatively, semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis were employed to elucidate educators’ perspectives regarding the use of AOMR and the broader integration of technology as a whole. Results showed a one-hundred-thirty times efficiency compared to the manual process without losing the accuracy and reliability of data. Participants underscored the positive effect of AOMR in diminishing the labor-intensive nature of a crucial yet arduous clerical task for educators. Additionally, participants also emphasized unexpected benefits, including email results distribution, backup e-copies of sheets, ease of data management, class record integration, and automated student ranking. These findings offer valuable insights into the challenges surrounding the integration of technology in educational contexts in general, shedding light on the advantages of AOMR in the evaluation of student test results, in particular.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronnel Pumares Cuerdo & Lyra Xyza Llagas Sinfuego, 2024. "Enhancing face-to-face evaluation using alternative optical mark recognition: A case study from the University of Cabuyao’s college of education," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 14(1), pages 118-132.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjw:socien:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:118-132
    DOI: 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.1.2905.2024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/soci-en/article/view/2905/2022
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.14.1.2905.2024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjw:socien:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:118-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vu Tuan Truong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/soci-en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.