IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v10y2024i12p744-747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Smartphone use in Medical Photography

Author

Listed:
  • Raoudha Mansouri

    (Medical Faculty of Tunis- Tunis El Manar University)

  • Anissa Ben Amor

    (Medical Faculty of Tunis- Tunis El Manar University)

  • Rim Charfi

    (Medical Faculty of Tunis- Tunis El Manar University)

  • Noureddine Litaiem

    (Medical Faculty of Tunis- Tunis El Manar University)

  • Aya Chakroun

    (Medical Faculty of Tunis- Tunis El Manar University)

  • Khadija Mzoughi

    (Medical Faculty of Tunis- Tunis El Manar University)

  • Lilia Zakhama

    (Medical Faculty of Tunis- Tunis El Manar University)

  • Iheb Labbene

    (Medical Faculty of Tunis- Tunis El Manar University)

  • Mohamed Jouini

    (Medical Faculty of Tunis- Tunis El Manar University)

Abstract

The modern era is becoming more and more digital. The use of smartphones for taking photos is widespread in the medical field. Most often, these photos are used for patient care, but also these photographs are used for educational and teaching purposes. Through a survey carried out among our university hospital doctors (HU), we wanted to establish an inventory of current practices in terms of taking but also using and storing medical photos and/or videos. Methods Prospective cross-sectional study, carried out among 1400 HU teaching doctors affiliated with the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, via a Google Forms questionnaire pre-established by the digital pedagogy committee, and sent by email through institutional mailing lists. Results We received 223 (15.9%) survey participants, divided into 52 specialties. Only 2.7% did not use their “smartphones†to take medical photos. Smartphones were used for taking photos and/or videos of patients (76.7%), medical records (70.9%), and slides, samples or radiological images (72.2%). Twenty-two percent of respondents were reluctant to use a smartphone for taking medical photos, due to the risk of loss or theft of the phone (69.2%) and a question of confidentiality and ethics (59. 3%). The taking of medical photos and/or videos was for patient care (81.6%), for educational purposes or for research (90.6%), for personal reference (39.5%), for entertainment or for social networks (0.9%). The smartphone would be the most accessible and the easiest to use (non-accessibility of a traditional camera (58.7%)). The classic camera, on the other hand, is considered the most secure. Nearly half of doctors (48.4%) stored their medical photos in a dedicated database, 21.5% with their personal photos and 42.2% on their personal computer. An inter-colleague exchange of medical photos via instant messaging on social networks in 47.3% of cases. The patient’s oral consent is always requested in 58.3% (46% however consider this to be insufficient). Written consent is obtained in 4.5%. However, 7.6% do not request any. The need to establish legal procedures for taking these photos, by establishing standardized consent forms, was mentioned by most of the responses. Conclusions The use of smartphones for taking medical photos and/or videos is widespread, easy and useful. However, consent must be detailed. Standardized procedures must be put in place to protect patients but also doctors.

Suggested Citation

  • Raoudha Mansouri & Anissa Ben Amor & Rim Charfi & Noureddine Litaiem & Aya Chakroun & Khadija Mzoughi & Lilia Zakhama & Iheb Labbene & Mohamed Jouini, 2024. "A Smartphone use in Medical Photography," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(12), pages 744-747, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:10:y:2024:i:12:p:744-747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-10-issue-12/744-747.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/a-smartphone-use-in-medical-photography/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:10:y:2024:i:12:p:744-747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.