IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bin/bpeajo/v53y2022i2022-01p233-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budgetary Implications of Economic Scenarios with Higher and Lower Interest Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip L. Swagel

    (Congressional Budget Office)

Abstract

The paper illustrates how the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO's) July 2021 baseline budget projections would have differed if the agency had used two alternative economic scenarios. The high-sixth scenarios is based on the average values of projections for several variables - including inflation and the growth of gross domestic product after removing the effects of inflation (read GDP) - from the six Blue Chip forecasters (about one-sixth of the total) with the highest average interest rate projections. The low-sixth scenario is based on the average values of projections for the same variables from the six Blue Chip forecasters with the lowest average interest rate projections. Using its simplified model of how macroeconomic changes would affect the federal budget, the CBO found that projected deficits would be $2.1 trillion larger from 2022 to 2031 under the high-sixth scenario (totaling $13.8 trillion) than under the low-sixth scenario ($11.7 trillion). Despite a greater amount of debt in dollar terms under the high-sixth scenario, federal debt held by the public as a percentage of GDP would total about 101 percent at the end of 2031 under both scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillip L. Swagel, 2022. "Budgetary Implications of Economic Scenarios with Higher and Lower Interest Rates," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 53(1 (Spring), pages 233-249.
  • Handle: RePEc:bin:bpeajo:v:53:y:2022:i:2022-01:p:233-249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/fiscal-policy-and-budget-deficits-following-the-pandemic/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bin:bpeajo:v:53:y:2022:i:2022-01:p:233-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Haowen Chen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esbrous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.