Call Money Interest Rate Determinants in Argentina
AbstractInterbank markets are crucial for the proper functioning of banking systems. The analysis of these markets has different dimensions: (i) the diversity of actors involved both from the demand and supply sides, (ii) the regulatory framework and (iii) the risks associated with financial operations. On the one hand, banks carry on the management of their short-term liquidity positions through this market. On the other hand, it is usually the main market where the monetary authority intervenes to carry out monetary policy. The implementation of monetary policy operates affecting banks’ liquidity positions; operations undertaken by central banks to fulfill their targets (open market operations, loans to financial institutions at different maturities, collaterals and haircuts, etc.) have their counterpart in debits or credits in accounts held by commercial banks at central banks. In Argentina, the interbank market consists of one segment where operations are guaranteed and another without collateral. The market for interbank shortterm unsecured loans (named call money market) is our object of study. However, since 2002 -when the Central Bank began to issue debt instruments and use them for open market operations- it has started to gain more dynamic an overnight repo market. This study analyzes the determinants of the interest rate on the market for unsecured overnight lending in Argentina focusing on the characteristics of the participants that are conducting operations there. Operations in the call market are conducted bilaterally. Each bank performs the risk assessment for every one of the counterparties and then opens a “folder” with the credit limit assigned. Clearing and settlement of these operations is done through the Central Bank’s real-time gross settlement system so they do not have “settlement” risk. However, as transactions arranged on the phone cannot be known by all operators, the market shows less transparency in comparison to an electronic trading system. Our database provides daily information for the call market on: (i) banks involved, and (ii) amount, currency, maturity, and interest rate and type of interest rate (fixed or variable) of the loan. We use overnight transactions granted at fixed interest rates in the domestic currency. Main conclusions state that the size of the bank is important in determining the interest rate to obtain or provide funds. Additionally, we find that both the bank’s ownership and concentration on the supply or demand side affect the cost of funds. On the other hand, when a bank is an MAE agent, and therefore can operate on the repo market, it is reflected in a lower interest rate. We show that some factors of the operation also affect the interest rate. First, there is a negative relationship between the interest rate and the amount of the operation. Secondly, the relationship among banks is relevant as the links established between two entities reduce the interest rate. Additionally, there are other factors with positive impact on the interbank market rate. Such is the case of repo interest rate fixed by the Central Bank or an extraordinary demand for funds, for example by the end of the year or holiday on Monday or Friday. Finally, episodes in which private sector deposits tend to be reduced significantly (defined as a daily fall greater to 0.2%) are reflected in an increase in the interest rate indicating a higher liquidity demand by banks.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Central Bank of Argentina, Economic Research Department in its journal Ensayos Económicos.
Volume (Year): 1 (2010)
Issue (Month): 57-58 (January - June)
Argentina; interest rate; interbank markets; monetary policy; short-term liquidity markets;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- E43 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
- E58 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Central Banks and Their Policies
- G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies
- G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Huberto M. Ennis & John A. Weinberg, 2007. "Interest on reserves and daylight credit," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, issue Spr, pages 111-142.
- C. H. Furfine, 2001. "The interbank market during a crisis," BIS Working Papers 99, Bank for International Settlements.
- Vítor Gaspar & Gabriel Pérez-Quirós & Hugo Rodríguez Mendizábal, 2004.
"Interest rate determination in the interbank market,"
Banco de Espaï¿½a Working Papers
0407, Banco de Espa�a.
- Gaspar, Vítor & Pérez Quirós, Gabriel & Rodríguez Mendizábal, Hugo, 2004. "Interest rate determination in the interbank market," Working Paper Series 0351, European Central Bank.
- Gaspar, Vítor & Pérez-Quirós, Gabriel & Rodriguez, Hugo, 2004. "Interest Rate Determination in the Interbank Market," CEPR Discussion Papers 4516, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Vitor Gaspar & Gabriel Pérez Quir? & Hugo Rodr?uez Mendiz?al, 2004. "Interest Rate Determination in the Interbank Market," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 603.04, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
- Scott Hendry & Nadja Kamhi, 2007. "Uncollateralized Overnight Loans Settled in LVTS," Working Papers 07-11, Bank of Canada.
- Huberto M. Ennis & Todd Keister, 2008. "Understanding monetary policy implementation," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, issue Sum, pages 235-263.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Federico Grillo).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.