IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2014i5p113-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multifund pension security system in comparison with other countries and the opportunities for its implementation in Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Jeko Milev

Abstract

The article sums up the main characteristic features of the multifund pension security system based on the experience of countries, where the model has been adopted. This is an analysis of possible portfolios, available to the insured persons to select from, their differences and their functioning in the course of time. Recommendations are made how to adopt some specific features of multifunds in the Bulgarian system, in order to optimize it. Three countries from Latin American (Chile, Peru, Colombia), one from Central America (Mexico) and five from Central and Eastern Europe (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Slovakia and Hungary) are studied. The paper points out the main features of the system in Armenia – the latest country, having introduced such type of security – since 1.01.2014.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeko Milev, 2014. "Multifund pension security system in comparison with other countries and the opportunities for its implementation in Bulgaria," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 113-132.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2014:i:5:p:113-132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=d09b527a-9c66-4cda-80c0-4ebaed513548&articleid=0631fdce-e50e-4321-b5e2-ff99db49aad5#a0631fdce-e50e-4321-b5e2-ff99db49aad5
    Download Restriction: Fee access (Bulgarian)
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2014:i:5:p:113-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.