IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2009i2p73-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutions as a Public Mechanism, Providing Profitability for Forest Owners and Users in the Models of Bulgarian Forest Sector Management

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantin Kolev
  • Ivan Yovkov

Abstract

The meaning of the categories contradiction and conflict is clarified. On this basis the conclusion is drawn up that contradictions in the different spheres of society are the source of changes in the institutions. The main characteristics of the Prussian and the American model of institutional changes and development of forestry are pointed out accordingly. As a result some lessons and trends for future institutional changes in the Bulgarian forest sector are formulated.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantin Kolev & Ivan Yovkov, 2009. "Institutions as a Public Mechanism, Providing Profitability for Forest Owners and Users in the Models of Bulgarian Forest Sector Management," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 73-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2009:i:2:p:73-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=0d659f98-6868-413f-b908-def61a356b8e&articleid=8575aaac-f270-4f10-a71e-cff6858c15fa#a8575aaac-f270-4f10-a71e-cff6858c15fa
    Download Restriction: Fee access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q26 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2009:i:2:p:73-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.