IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2005i7p115-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possibilities to Improve the Complex Assessment of the Quality of Economic Research

Author

Listed:
  • Pano Loulanski

Abstract

There are identified and analyzed some major aspects of the quality of economic research. An attempt is made at outlining the possible directions for improvement of its complex assessment. The achievement of that objective involves the performing of the following tasks: summarizing the main points in the nature and the mechanism of assessment; assessment of the content-related aspect of the research; assessment of the relation "analysis-results" of the research process; analysis of the formed traditional negative features of research work.

Suggested Citation

  • Pano Loulanski, 2005. "Possibilities to Improve the Complex Assessment of the Quality of Economic Research," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 7, pages 115-129.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2005:i:7:p:115-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=9ede3d38-0eca-4a6f-932e-b287a639ab22&articleid=6cd7b4a5-34a1-4cb9-969c-dfc28255eada#a6cd7b4a5-34a1-4cb9-969c-dfc28255eada
    Download Restriction: Fee access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Z00 - Other Special Topics - - General - - - General
    • A31 - General Economics and Teaching - - Multisubject Collective Works - - - Multisubject Collected Writings of Individuals

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2005:i:7:p:115-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.