Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Political Economy and Economics: Criticism of Attitudes towards Similarities and Differences between Them

Contents:

Author Info

  • Kamen Mirkovich
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    This paper presents a detailed criticism of U. M. Ossipov’s thesis concerning the science of Economics, which he claims to be drifting away from its subject and who, in that connection, advocates the return of economic science to its classical and philosophical foundations. A constructive criticism of Ossipov's thesis is offered, and the need for synthesizing economics and political economy into theoretical economy is substantiated. In it, besides the theory of marginal utility, there must also be developed the theory of marginal value, and they should be given equal standing in economic science.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=4c76a677-792d-45b3-b763-c611cd8aa253&articleid=3d24cdd8-bb67-4281-830a-e3ee98334fbb#a3d24cdd8-bb67-4281-830a-e3ee98334fbb
    Download Restriction: Fee access

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute in its journal Economic Thought.

    Volume (Year): (2004)
    Issue (Month): 7 ()
    Pages: 66-95

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2004:i:7:p:66-95

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 3, Aksakov Str., 1040, Sofia
    Phone: (+359 2) 810 40 18
    Fax: (+359 2) 988 21 08
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.iki.bas.bg
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2004:i:7:p:66-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vassil Zahariev).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.