IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2000i2p3-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Transition to Market Economy – Determination, Referent Models and Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Metody Kanev

Abstract

Defined is the concept of transition. Reasoned is the thesis that the transition is neither accidental nor is due to subjective management mistakes. It is objectively determined by the fact that the socialist experiment as a “diversion” from the civilization development doomed to delay the countries from Central and Eastern Europe comparing not only to the economically most developed countries, but to the world. The change is determined also by the forming in the world “new economy” – eco-socially-market, from tertiary-information type, capable to integrate in the world networks. Drawn are the constituting principles and referent models of the newly emerged market economies. They explain why the transition looks like a “conservative revolution”. Made is comparison between the principles, on which the Anglo-Saxon and German-Japanese model lay. Presented is a generalized estimation of the growth of the countries in transition and is outlined the place of the countries (incl. Bulgaria) in the transformation process. Pointed are the reasons for divergence of the countries in transition and is analyzed the significance of the type of the economic policy. Reasoned is the conclusion that our choice should be undoubtedly towards liberalism, combined with the strategic role of the state. Defended is the thesis about the transition as a dualistic process, i. e. about its dirigible and spontaneous character. The both sides provoke conflict of the emerging market logic with the quasi oligarchy way of the change, set in the nature of the transition. Interpreted are some criteria for finalization of the transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Metody Kanev, 2000. "The Transition to Market Economy – Determination, Referent Models and Policy," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 3-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2000:i:2:p:3-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=df207684-9f46-4d4e-b7ba-86892e9694df&articleid=cc6dd4da-8f87-43ae-a16d-ca994fb66679#acc6dd4da-8f87-43ae-a16d-ca994fb66679
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2000:i:2:p:3-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.