IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/taprar/v5y2022i2p30-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Justification of approaches to development of the standard civil society organization based on international experience

Author

Listed:
  • Kateryna Pylypko

    (National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv)

  • Leonora Adamchuk

    (National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine; National Science Center «PI Prokopovich Institute of Beekeeping»)

  • Artem Antoniv

    (National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine)

  • Sedat Sevin

    (Ankara University)

Abstract

The object of the research is the principles of the quality management system and the interaction of different approaches to the quality assessment of civil society organizations (CSOs). In many countries, regulatory documents have not been developed regarding the quality management of the CSO activities. Let’s consider this problem using the example of Ukraine, since there has been an increase in the number of public associations by more than 85,000 during the last decade. Along with it, the principles of implementing DSTU ISO 9001:2015 for non-commercial, in particular civil organizations, are not sufficiently clear, given the various socio-cultural and economic prerequisites. Based on theoretical and analytical methods, it is proposed to conduct an in-depth analysis of the problem and further justification of the implementation of the practice of compliance with Quality Standards and good governance in civil society organizations. That is primarily due to the desire of CSOs themselves to self-organize, reinforced by the need to establish partnership relations with state authorities and commercial organizations, which is accompanied by the fulfillment of requirements for transparency, accountability, and effectiveness of CSOs activities. Adherence to Quality Standards forms a commitment on the part of CSOs to generally accepted ethical principles and standards of behavior, which further contributes to the achievement of social legitimacy. Based on the analyzed regulatory and technical documentation, the need to develop a Quality Standard of Ukraine for CSOs based on the complementarity of different approaches to evaluating the quality of organizations according to the «Quality Standard of CSOs» and DSTU ISO 9001:2015 is substantiated. The results of the analysis of registered public associations by organizational and legal forms in Ukraine confirm the tendency to increase their number, which is a prerequisite for the implementation of the international experience of using the CSO Quality Standard. Taking into account the results of a comparative assessment of the principles of the CSO Quality Standard and DSTU ISO 9001:2015, wit is possible to state that there are no differences in the main approaches to managing the quality system of organizations. The governance aspects of the Modified Organizational Capacity Assessment Tool are similar to those of the «Quality Standard of CSOs», based on the subcategories: authorities; values, vision, and mission of the organization; management style and leadership; strategic planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Kateryna Pylypko & Leonora Adamchuk & Artem Antoniv & Sedat Sevin, 2022. "Justification of approaches to development of the standard civil society organization based on international experience," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 5(2(67)), pages 30-37, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:5:y:2022:i:2:p:30-37
    DOI: 10.15587/2706-5448.2022.267575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/267575/263537
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.267575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:5:y:2022:i:2:p:30-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.