IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/jetart/v2y2021i13p106-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of state of public financing of environmental protection

Author

Listed:
  • Nataliia Yaroshevych

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University)

  • Volodymyr Stybel

    (Stepan Gzhytskyi National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies Lviv)

  • Bogdan Gutyj

    (Stepan Gzhytskyi National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies Lviv)

  • Oleh Hrymak

    (National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies Lviv)

  • Lesya Kushnir

    (Stepan Gzhytskyi National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies Lviv)

  • Tetyana Kalaitan

    (Stepan Gzhytskyi National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies Lviv)

  • Iryna Kondrat

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University)

Abstract

The main task of this study consists in evaluating the state of funding for environmental protection measures and substantiating the ability of the state and local communities to increase investments in environmental protection. To this end, the following was studied from 2010 through 2020: 1) mechanisms of filling and using funds of the Environmental Protection Fund of state and local budgets; 2) proportions of distribution of environmental revenues and expenditures between levels of the budget system. The analysis results showed that opportunities of the public economy sector in terms of environmental investment are reduced because of imperfect distributing mechanisms: ‒ the budgetary expenditures for environmental protection measures; ‒ the environmental tax revenues to the budget funds. It was established that a significant part (about 70 %) of the "environmental" funds of the public economy sector is directed to non-priority goals and measures. Less than half of the amount of environmental tax revenues is allocated for financing environmental activities. This does little to address pressing environmental issues and hinders the sustainable development of the country. There was a significant discrepancy between the tax burden on "polluters" of water bodies (3 % of the total amount of environmental tax) and the levels of their polluting activities (30‒40 % of all costs of the national economy to eliminate the effects of pollution). In order to increase public investments in the reproduction of the environmental and natural resource potential: 1) ways to improve the mechanism of using the Fund of Environmental Protection were proposed; 2) reserves for increasing capital environmental investments from the budget have been identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Nataliia Yaroshevych & Volodymyr Stybel & Bogdan Gutyj & Oleh Hrymak & Lesya Kushnir & Tetyana Kalaitan & Iryna Kondrat, 2021. "Analysis of state of public financing of environmental protection," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 6(13(114)), pages 106-119, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:2:y:2021:i:13:p:106-119
    DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2021.249159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/249159/247013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.249159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kalaitan, Tetyana & Stybel, Volodymyr & Hrymak, Oleh & Sarakhman, Oksana & Shurpenkova, Ruslana, 2023. "State support of the dairy industry and prospects for its development in the post-war period," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(3), September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:2:y:2021:i:13:p:106-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.