IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bao/ijimes/v2y2022i4p65-80id69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predatory Publication in Science and Ethical Principles: Features and Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Nwanua Ohei
  • Sam Lubbe

Abstract

Purpose: The scientific endeavor necessitates publication and assessment of research output with peer-review at its core. Conventional academic publication models, research appraisal, and peer-review procedures, on the other hand, have always been open to abuse and malpractice, putting the integrity of research at risk and exposing the scholarly communication system to overt economic predation. Predatory journals are a well-known problem in scientific publication, and they serve as repository for fabricated research. The volume of predatory journals has increased in recent years, and thus it is vital to propose a resolution to this problem. A well-known problem in scientific publishing is predatory journals, and they are repositories for phony research. The volume of predatory journals has risen in recent years, and it is imperative to present a solution for this academic fraud. Methodology: In this review, the researchers conducted a systematic literature search of the following databases that included Web of Science (all databases), online library repositories. All processes of the review stages included access to the search results and full articles for review and consequent analysis. Articles were added after screening full text articles by meeting the inclusion criteria and meeting none of the exclusion criteria. As there were a high number of articles reporting findings on predatory journals, they were further screened re-evaluated for relevance and for any deviation from the theme of this study. Findings: This paper illustrates and examines predatory publishing regarding academic journals, as well as offering a list of features to use in identifying predatory publications. The report concludes with a discussion of proposed solutions on what should be done to eliminate or mitigate the challenges of this development. Originality/Value: In this paper, we will discuss predatory journals, and basic characteristic in identifying them.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Nwanua Ohei & Sam Lubbe, 2022. "Predatory Publication in Science and Ethical Principles: Features and Solutions," International Journal of Innovation in Management, Economics and Social Sciences, International Scientific Network (ISNet), vol. 2(4), pages 65-80.
  • Handle: RePEc:bao:ijimes:v:2:y:2022:i:4:p:65-80:id:69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijimes.ir/index.php/ijimes/article/view/69/155
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bao:ijimes:v:2:y:2022:i:4:p:65-80:id:69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: International Scientific Network (ISNet) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijimes.ir/index.php/ijimes/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.