IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220184232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospects For Implementing Participatory Budgeting As An Effective Instrument For Implementing Budgetary Policy At The Local Level

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Sirenko

    (Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Ukraine)

  • Olga Melnyk

    (Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Ukraine)

  • Nataliia Shyshpanova

    (Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Ukraine)

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the methodological principles for implementing Participatory Budgeting as an effective instrument of the budgetary policy at the local level, in particular, the analysis of the main risks and limitations of this process, the identification of its main stages and the features of the main types of activity, which includes each stage. Methodological bases of the study consist of general scientific methods of obtaining knowledge of economic phenomena and processes. Realization of study tasks requires the following methods: method of theoretical generalization - during the study of scientific works, regulatory legal acts; abstractlogical method - to generalize the theoretical and methodical provisions, as well as to determine the purpose of the study; method of a systematic approach - the definition of directions for improving the functioning of Participatory Budgeting as an effective instrument for implementing budgetary policy. Results. The main components, which should include Participatory Budgeting process are proposed, the purpose of which is to facilitate the establishment of a social dialogue between local authorities and residents of the territorial community, and to create conditions for the participation of the residents of the territorial community in the budgetary processes to meet their needs. The analysis of the conducted studies made it possible to determine the main risks and limitations of participatory budgeting. Practical implications. The main stages of the participatory budgeting process are outlined, in particular: the preparatory stage, the stage of budget formation and its approval, the main point of which is the establishment of a budget committee and the commencement of its work, the implementation stage, the stage of monitoring and evaluation of participatory budgeting. The main types of activity included in each stage have been studied. All of the above made it possible to develop a cycle of participatory budgeting as one of the directions of budgetary policy. We believe that the popularity of this process is determined by the benefits received by the residents, local authorities and the city in general. Value/originality. Formation and implementation of budgetary policy at the local level in the current conditions of decentralization of power with the help of the developed cycle of implementation of Participatory Budgeting will promote the establishment of a social dialogue between local authorities and territorial community, creating conditions for the participation of residents of the territorial community in a transparent budgetary process to meet their needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Sirenko & Olga Melnyk & Nataliia Shyshpanova, 2018. "Prospects For Implementing Participatory Budgeting As An Effective Instrument For Implementing Budgetary Policy At The Local Level," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:2:32
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-2-222-228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/404/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/404
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-2-222-228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    budgetary system; budget; budget of participation; fiscal policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:2:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.