IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220184143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Antitrust Treatment Of Electricity Market Of Ukraine: Conundrum With The Concept Of Collective Dominance And Eu Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Kseniia Smyrnova

    (Department of Comparative and European Law, Institute of International Relations, Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University, Ukraine)

  • Anton Korynevych

    (Department of International Law, Institute of International Relations, Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University, Ukraine)

Abstract

The main purpose of the article is to provide comparison research of collective dominance doctrine and practice in the EU and the enforcement practice in Ukraine. Methodology. The paper focused on the compliance of AMCU's analysis of national electricity market in Ukraine with the European law enforcement practice that arises from the international legal obligations of Ukraine to use in its practice the EU competition rules according to Article 18 of the Treaty establishing the Energy Community and taking into account the criteria of interpretation in accordance with the EU case law. Article 255 of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU that clearly provides the principle of transparency, non-discrimination, and neutrality in compliance with the procedures of the procedural justice and the right of defence also indicates a special actuality of the carried-out research in this field. The main practical impact of such research is to implement not only substantial norms of the EU Competition law but its enforcement practice & to introduce it within the practice of AMCU. Value/originality. The paper examines a dominance doctrine, market power definition, economic strength, and collective dominance practice in the EU enforcement practice. A special attention was paid to enforcement practice in the electricity market. Due to the fact that the investigation of Ukrainian electricity market was provided for the first time in Ukraine, there is no practice yet in this issue. This causes the necessity of wide comparative approach in the principles of collective dominance in the electricity market in Ukraine. Results. The paper finds that the AMCU's approach to electricity market regulation in Ukraine confirms the necessity to reform the system of the governmental regulation in the wholesale electricity market and in the market of services for electricity transmission, necessity for the change of the system for tariff and pricing policy formation on the part of the National Energy and Utilities Regulatory Commission of Ukraine and the Ministry of Energy and Coal-Mining Industry of Ukraine for developing the competition in electricity market and the need to follow the approaches and criteria of the EU competition law with regard to determination of the dominance in the market, which is stipulated by the international legal obligations of Ukraine arising from Articles 18 and 94 of the Treaty establishing the Energy Community and Art. 255 of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement.

Suggested Citation

  • Kseniia Smyrnova & Anton Korynevych, 2018. "The Antitrust Treatment Of Electricity Market Of Ukraine: Conundrum With The Concept Of Collective Dominance And Eu Experience," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:1:43
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-319-327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/366/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/366
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-319-327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    competition; collective dominance; EU; Ukraine; Anti-Monopoly Committee of Ukraine; wholesale electricity market;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:1:43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.