IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/jurr00/y2010v4i2p147-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge transfer in regeneration: Is it feasible and can the community benefit?

Author

Listed:
  • Engelsman, Udi
  • Southern, Alan

Abstract

This paper looks critically at the operation of a Knowledge Transfer Partnership involving the University of Liverpool, UK, and a Merseyside-based housing association. The initial objective of the Partnership was to develop new knowledge to be ‘transferred’ from academia to the organisation involved in local regeneration, and thus from the organisation to the community. The initiative took place in Anfield and Breckfield, North Liverpool, and, as it evolved, a number of aspects became apparent. First, the ideals of knowledge transfer, held in the sense of action research being initiated, helped to scope the project. Second, rather than a transfer of knowledge taking place, what happened was the co-construction of regeneration knowledge with no particular constituency taking the lead role, but all enabled through the project. Third, it was evident that the users of this new knowledge would exercise their respective authority in different ways, and this became key to understanding how knowledge transfer in regeneration is feasible and how the community might benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Engelsman, Udi & Southern, Alan, 2010. "Knowledge transfer in regeneration: Is it feasible and can the community benefit?," Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 4(2), pages 147-157, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:jurr00:y:2010:v:4:i:2:p:147-157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/1903/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/1903/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Knowledge transfer; regeneration; partnerships; community development; Anfield;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z33 - Other Special Topics - - Tourism Economics - - - Marketing and Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jurr00:y:2010:v:4:i:2:p:147-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.