IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/jurr00/y2008v2i1p7-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'Doing evaluation': A consultant's perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Longlands, Sarah
  • Markus, Francis

Abstract

Evaluation is important for regeneration and economic development, as it helps to demonstrate the impact that initiatives have on local people and places. This is important to ensure that one continues to learn lessons, to demonstrate accountability and to improve the effectiveness of future initiatives and policy. There are a variety of different approaches to tackling evaluation, including the Centre for Local Economic Strategies (CLES) evaluation framework, which sets out a generic four-step guide to developing and implementing the evaluation process. There have also been numerous publications on evaluation produced by other organisations, including the New Economics Foundation and Charities Evaluation Service. In CLES Consulting's experience, evaluation can bring with it a number of challenges and pitfalls, including the challenges of commissioning external evaluation, assessing the underlying rationale, performance measurement, attribution, additionality and value for money. This paper considers different approaches to evaluation and some of the main challenges that evaluation can pose to an evaluation team. This is based on CLES Consulting's own experience of developing and delivering evaluation across the UK and Ireland.

Suggested Citation

  • Longlands, Sarah & Markus, Francis, 2008. "'Doing evaluation': A consultant's perspective," Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 2(1), pages 7-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:jurr00:y:2008:v:2:i:1:p:7-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/1721/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/1721/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Evaluation; evaluation framework; rationale; outputs and outcomes; performance; challenges; commissioning; involvement; measuring;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z33 - Other Special Topics - - Tourism Economics - - - Marketing and Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jurr00:y:2008:v:2:i:1:p:7-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.