IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/jbsav0/y2017v6i2p158-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of implementing unmanned aerial vehicles to survey buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Clarke, Jordan

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are becoming an increasingly viable tool in conducting building surveys. They are becoming available off the shelf. However, the legislation litigating their use is failing to keep up with the technological developments. This paper focuses on how effective the technology is at identifying building defects in hard-to-reach locations, specifically, in contrast to traditional methods such as MEWPs and scaffolding. Previous reviews have been examined, analysing their reliability and credibility. An in-depth examination of the current legislation prohibiting the use of UAVs has been evaluated, considering their current and future implications for the surveyor. UAVs are certainly an effective tool for conducting surveys. However, this is not true for all cases. Existing legislation prevents the ‘aerial work’ being undertaken in cities and built-up areas. The paper argues that the Civil Aviation Authority must become more lenient to commercial operations in these areas if the industry is to grow.

Suggested Citation

  • Clarke, Jordan, 2017. "The effectiveness of implementing unmanned aerial vehicles to survey buildings," Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 6(2), pages 158-170, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:jbsav0:y:2017:v:6:i:2:p:158-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/1793/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/1793/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    unmanned aerial vehicles; building surveys; drones; aerial work; CAA; ANO;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jbsav0:y:2017:v:6:i:2:p:158-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.