IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/jbsav0/y2014v3i3p276-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative testing of hydraulic lime and OPC mortar mixes

Author

Listed:
  • Hetherington, Stephen

    (Department of the Natural and Built Environment)

Abstract

In recent years there has been in increasing trend towards the use of hydraulic lime-based mortars within the construction industry, especially in low-rise domestic dwelling — due in part to their sustainable credentials. However, the construction industry has, until recent times, solely relied upon the use of Portland cement-based mortars and the introduction of lime-based mortars has added another dimension to the choice of binder and mortar specification to use. This limited comparative study is designed to clarify the relative merits of the two binder types in terms of their compressive strength, flexural strength, water absorption and porosity. The study was conducted using three different binder to aggregated designations: 1 part binder to 3 parts sand, 1 part binder to 6 parts sand and 1 part binder to 8 parts sand. The binder designations were chosen to give a range of different mortar types that are commonly used in the industry. A constant mass of aggregate was used and the proportion of ‘binder to be added’ calculated to give the desired ratios. This was done to enable greater control and consistency over the workability of each mix when adding the water.

Suggested Citation

  • Hetherington, Stephen, 2014. "Comparative testing of hydraulic lime and OPC mortar mixes," Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 3(3), pages 276-284, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:jbsav0:y:2014:v:3:i:3:p:276-284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/1341/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/1341/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    comparative study; hydraulic lime; Portland cement; compressive strength; flexural strength; porosity; water absorption;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jbsav0:y:2014:v:3:i:3:p:276-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.