IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/awu/journl/v6y2012i1p51-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deficit Paranoia and Unemployment: A Critical Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Constantinos Alexiou

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to provide a conceptual perspective on the potential merits of deficits as well as to assess the relevance of the NAIRU concept, by touching on the fundamental arguments for and against public deficits. In periods of economic austerity, structural deficits can have stimulating effects on economic growth. Policy makers should pursue a high-employment deficit target such that the debt-to-GDP ratio remains constant. The NAIRU is a rather antiquated notion that has to be carefully reconsidered. The existing mechanism reflected by the dominant neoliberal doctrine has put paid to any adjustment efforts to consolidate the economies; hence, adding further to the problem by transferring the entire burden of adjustment to labor markets. Instead of striving to eliminate deficit regardless of the shape of the economy, we should try and pursue a deficit that is sufficiently large to provide the effective demand for all of the goods and services the economy can generate. The effects of cumulative causation can lead to a chain reaction capable of putting the economy on the road to recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantinos Alexiou, 2012. "Deficit Paranoia and Unemployment: A Critical Perspective," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 6(1), pages 51-63, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:awu:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:51-63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:awu:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:51-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maria Cristina Barbieri Goes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.bulletinofpe.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.