IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v9y2019ispecialp60-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges and perspectives of administrative judiciary in the Republic of North Macedonia Abstract: The development of administrative judiciary in the Republic of North Macedonia went through various phases after its independence in 1991. 16 years after its independence, in late 2007 the Administrative Court was established as one of the holders of the judiciary in judicial system. Before the establishment of this court, the administrative dispute was under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. The Administrative Court appears as a guarantor for exercising the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and the laws before the administrative bodies, which provide court protection in the event of an unlawful conduct by the administration. For this reason, administrative justice plays a key role in the lives of citizens who seek it when they consider that state authorities are preventing the enjoyment of a constitutional or legal right, or that they are imposing an obligation outside the legal rules. With this paper the author by explaining the process of development of the administrative judiciary using: normative legal method, comparative legal method, systematic and objective interpretative methods, will focus on the specific analysis of ineffectiveness of administrative justice in the practice, which is due, first of all, to the lack of a mechanism for implementing the judgments of the Administrative Court

Author

Listed:
  • Jeton Shasivari

    (Associate professor of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, South East European University, Tetova, Republic of North Macedonia)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeton Shasivari, 2019. "Challenges and perspectives of administrative judiciary in the Republic of North Macedonia Abstract: The development of administrative judiciary in the Republic of North Macedonia went through various," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 9(Special), pages 60-76, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:9:y:2019:i:special:p:60-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An9vS/5.%20Jeton%20Shasivari.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    administrative bodies; administrative dispute; administrative justice; administrative case law; full dispute; dispute for annulment of administrative act.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:9:y:2019:i:special:p:60-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.