IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v6y2016i2p271-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examination of judicial practice on the exercise of parental authority by a single parent

Author

Listed:
  • Valeria Gheorghiu

    („Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Police Academy of Bucharest)

Abstract

The specific objective of the present study lies in identifying how respected the principle of joint exercise of parental authority, enshrined in the Romanian legislature. The aim of Civil fundamental rule is to recognize the active participation regarding compliance by the parents of the right to psychological and physical welfare of their children, growth, education, training and their health. Analysis interests of the child enshrined rule that parental rights are not only father but also parental duties so that this breach legal obligations should be duly reasoned. Knowledge of basic civil complying with the requirements resulting from commitments made by Romania in the European integration process and the new status of our country's membership of the European Union. Jurisprudence should share the idea that joint parental authority is the rule and the exception exclusive. The availability principle in subsequent civil trial must be the protection of the interests of the child. Just this social reality we can talk about a Europe constituted by and for children.

Suggested Citation

  • Valeria Gheorghiu, 2016. "Examination of judicial practice on the exercise of parental authority by a single parent," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 271-281, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:271-281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An6v22/20%20Gheorghiu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    child; parental authority; the child's best interest; dignity; freedom of opinion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K36 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Family and Personal Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:271-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.