IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/ijells/v9y2020i3p210-218id468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ Attitudes towards Written Error Corrections: A Study in an Omani EFL Context

Author

Listed:
  • Peyman Nouraey
  • Fatemeh Behjat

Abstract

Knowing errors and their sources often aids teachers in error correction processes. The present study aimed at investigating how the students of General Foundation Program (GFP) in Oman tend to deal with written error corrections and the related feedback provided to them. It is also an attempt to examine students’ attitudes and preferences towards the feedback on their written errors. In doing so, sixty undergraduate students were selected as participants of the study. A questionnaire was distributed among the participants, containing information on a) when the students would prefer to receive the feedback on their written errors, b) who they would prefer to give the feedback, and c) what type of feedback they would prefer to receive. Findings revealed that the participants would mostly prefer to receive feedback on their written errors during the revising stage. In addition, it was highlighted that feedback provided by the teachers was more popular among the participants as compared to peer or self-corrections. Finally, results indicated that most of the students would prefer to receive feedback on all of their written errors, rather than some or none of the errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Peyman Nouraey & Fatemeh Behjat, 2020. "Students’ Attitudes towards Written Error Corrections: A Study in an Omani EFL Context," International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(3), pages 210-218.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:ijells:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:210-218:id:468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5019/article/view/468/879
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:ijells:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:210-218:id:468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5019/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.