IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/ijells/v5y2016i1p55-65id569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Using Electronic Dictionary on Collocation Learning and Retention of Iranian EFL Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Zeinab Toghyani Murnani
  • Hadi Salehi

Abstract

One of the first and potential strategies used in order to develop language learning is using dictionary. Digital dictionaries have changed this process dramatically in the last two decades. The current study was intended to investigate the impact of electronic dictionary on learning and long term retention of language collocation of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. In order to this end, Oxford Placement Test (OPT) was run among 340 learners in 6 different language institutes. In total, 100 participants whose scores were between 40 to 50 were chosen as the intermediate level and were assigned to experimental and control groups. The participants in both groups received the treatment in 8 sessions, 45 minutes each. Two groups were taught 64 collocations during the eight sessions of the treatment. The experimental group used electronic collocation dictionary (ECD) to find meaning and definition of a new taught collocation, while the control group recognized collocation through the prior knowledge. Each group acquired pretest in one form (fill in the blank), an immediate posttest was run immediately after the treatment and a delayed posttest administered two weeks later. The outcomes of the study showed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group. Hence, using electronic dictionary to teach collocation can improve the process of acquiring collocations, but it cannot guarantee long term retention of collocations. This study also provides pedagogical implications to utilize ED as an effective learning tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeinab Toghyani Murnani & Hadi Salehi, 2016. "Impact of Using Electronic Dictionary on Collocation Learning and Retention of Iranian EFL Learners," International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(1), pages 55-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:ijells:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:55-65:id:569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5019/article/view/569/1019
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:ijells:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:55-65:id:569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5019/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.