IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/ijells/v11y2022i4p181-190id4668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lexical Density as Improvement Indicator in the Written Performance of EFL Majors

Author

Listed:
  • Abdalla Elkheir Elgobshawi
  • Mohammed Aldawsari

Abstract

This study assesses lexical density in the written performance of a controlled sample of Saudi undergraduates majoring in English as a Foreign Language (EFL). It explores the relationship between lexical density and the quality of written performance by measuring lexical density in sample texts of learner's final exams. Linguistic content analysis was used on these texts to categorize terms and to find links between them. Each document’s functional and content terms were counted and divided by the total words in the text to compute lexical density. The study reveals that the lexical density in the written performance of Saudi EFL undergraduates is categorized as less dense than that of their higher-level peers, indicating an increase in lexical density as students are upgraded to higher levels of study. The lexical density varies according to a learner’s proficiency because the data obtained show differences between the lexical density scores of the two samples. The findings also suggest that the length of a text does not always imply that the content is lexically rich. The study provides evidence of the possibility of improving EFL learners’ reasoning performance when this performance is characterized by lexical density. The study urges that raising teachers’ awareness about lexical density and how it affects writing could also be a pedagogical implication of the current study.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdalla Elkheir Elgobshawi & Mohammed Aldawsari, 2022. "Lexical Density as Improvement Indicator in the Written Performance of EFL Majors," International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(4), pages 181-190.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:ijells:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:181-190:id:4668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5019/article/view/4668/7355
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:ijells:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:181-190:id:4668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5019/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.