IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/arjoes/v7y2023i2p56-65id4895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability of educational technologies: An approach to ratio and feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Malissa Maria Mahmud
  • Nur Huslinda Che Mat
  • Mohammad Radzi Manap
  • Siti Fauziana Zakaria
  • Farina Tazijan
  • Shiau Foong Wong

Abstract

Blended learning is a driving force behind new pedagogical approaches. While many studies have shown the positive effects of blended learning on the students’ learning outcomes, the extent and breadth of its sustainability remains an interesting question, given the rapid evolution and diversification of technology post COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we examined the ratio of technological interventions in blended learning studies, and their corresponding students’ feedback by categorizing 37 compliant articles. With a defined set of inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a clear search strategy, we employed systematic reviews to comprehensively and systematically identify, evaluate, and synthesize relevant evidence to probe on a specific research question. The results advocate the notion of ratio, regardless of its specific percentages, predominantly proffering positive feedback, indicating that the integration of technology is essential for supporting sustainable strategies in teaching and learning approaches. Overall, these findings provide a comprehensive body of high-quality evidence that blended learning has the potential to meritoriously support sustainable education model. It has significant practical significance in addition to its implications for empirical research. Additionally, it produces structured guidelines as a result of its thorough analysis, which may help to accelerate the adoption of blended learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Malissa Maria Mahmud & Nur Huslinda Che Mat & Mohammad Radzi Manap & Siti Fauziana Zakaria & Farina Tazijan & Shiau Foong Wong, 2023. "Sustainability of educational technologies: An approach to ratio and feedback," Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(2), pages 56-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:arjoes:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:56-65:id:4895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5052/article/view/4895/7777
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:arjoes:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:56-65:id:4895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5052/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.