IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v5y2015i5p790-804id1388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Efficiency between Conventional and Islamic Banks in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Shinta Amalina Hazrati Havidz
  • Chandra Setiawan

Abstract

This paper investigates the bank efficiency as a basis performance measurement in the Conventional and Islamic banks in Indonesia in the period of January 2008 – September 2013 using quarterly-published report data of Central Bank (Bank Indonesia) with 6 Conventional banks and 3 Islamic banks in Indonesia as the samples of the research. The Bank efficiency in this research is measured using financial ratios and macroeconomics as determinants of Return on Assets (ROA) and non-parametric approach DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis). In term of variables that determine ROA using panel least square by estimating Fixed Effect Method (FEM), the findings reveal that there are significant effects of Loans to deposit ratio (LDR), Operational efficiency ratio (OER) and GDP growth rate to ROA and there are no significant effects of Capital Adequacy ratio (CAR), Size and inflation rate in the Conventional banks in Indonesia. On the other hand, all the independent variables have significant effect to ROA, except financing to deposit ratio (FDR) in the Islamic banks in Indonesia. GDP growth rate is the highest coefficient among the determinant variables used in this research that affect ROA of both Conventional and Islamic banks and the weakest coefficient that affects ROA is CAR in the Conventional banks and FDR in the Islamic banks. The findings of DEA indicate that the bank inefficiency is caused of not-well function of banks and managers of banks are not able to use the firms’ given resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Shinta Amalina Hazrati Havidz & Chandra Setiawan, 2015. "A Comparative Study of Efficiency between Conventional and Islamic Banks in Indonesia," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(5), pages 790-804.
    • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:790-804:id:1388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/1388/2004
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Md Reiazul Haque & Md Nurul Islam Sohel, 2019. "Are Islamic Banks Less Efficient than other Banks? Evidence from Bangladesh," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(10), pages 1136-1146, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:790-804:id:1388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.