IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v14y2024i5p326-338id5040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical validation of marginalisation thesis on the participation in the informal economy in Goa

Author

Listed:
  • Gouri Kanta Manerkar
  • BP Sarath Chandran

Abstract

This paper investigates the global increase in informal labor, focusing on two primary theoretical perspectives: the marginalization thesis and the reinforcement thesis. Previous empirical studies across various contexts have not definitively settled this debate. The current study, conducted in Goa, India, offers distinctive insights. Data from 200 informally employed individuals in both the formal and informal sectors was collected using snowball sampling. The findings of the binary logistic regression model reveal that the marginalisation thesis holds true, as individuals who are marginalised in terms of gender, age, education, and household employment in the informal sector are more likely to engage in informal employment. Conversely, the reinforcement thesis is supported when workplace characteristics such as flexible work timing and employment in construction services are considered. Therefore, the study concludes that a combination of marginalisation and reinforcement factors explains the reasons behind participation in the informal economy. Therefore, analysing labour market dynamics can offer valuable insights into informal employment.

Suggested Citation

  • Gouri Kanta Manerkar & BP Sarath Chandran, 2024. "Empirical validation of marginalisation thesis on the participation in the informal economy in Goa," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 14(5), pages 326-338.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:326-338:id:5040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/5040/7917
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:326-338:id:5040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.