IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v14y2024i4p250-263id5017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foreign aid, institutional quality, and income inequality in Africa: A dynamic panel threshold approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Saney Dalmar
  • Suryati Ishak
  • Saifuzzaman Ibrahim
  • Hanny Zurina Hamzah

Abstract

This study examines the impact of foreign aid and institutions on income inequality in 23 African countries during the period from 2005 to 2017. The study used a newly proposed novel dynamic panel threshold technique. The results of the study found an institutional quality threshold value of 1.622. Below the threshold, foreign aid was found to positively and significantly influence income inequality. However, above the threshold, the coefficient of foreign aid was negative with statistical significance. This implies that foreign aid tends to diminish income inequality in the presence of quality institutions. The study also used the quantile regression method to check for robustness. It showed that the conclusion between aid and inequality is the same in most of the quantiles (0.1 and 0.2). The findings can be worthwhile for sketching proper aid policies to lessen inequality. Policymakers in Africa should prioritize establishing high-quality institutions and developing measures to improve existing ones. Thus, aid could potentially reduce income inequality. This study suggests that it is important to note that aid programs can be effective when tailored to the particular needs and circumstances of each beneficiary country, as one-size-fits-all methods may not produce the anticipated outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Saney Dalmar & Suryati Ishak & Saifuzzaman Ibrahim & Hanny Zurina Hamzah, 2024. "Foreign aid, institutional quality, and income inequality in Africa: A dynamic panel threshold approach," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 14(4), pages 250-263.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:250-263:id:5017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/5017/7894
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:250-263:id:5017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.