IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v13y2023i12p913-922id4889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the random walk hypothesis hold for Indian stock markets during parliamentary elections?

Author

Listed:
  • Khemraj Alias Sangam Shet
  • SriRam Padyala
  • Ramesh Bommadevara

Abstract

In this study, we examine the random walk hypothesis for two well-known Indian indices, BSE (Sensex) and NSE (Nifty), by considering country-specific political events (parliamentary elections). Two pertaining questions were studied. First, efficiency with respect to weak form, semi-strong form, and strong form; and second, the random walk pattern of the return by applying the new variance ratio tests. We use 21 years of daily closing stock price data of both the National Stock Exchange (NSE) Nifty Index and the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) Sensex Index. The hypothesis is tested by using both conventional and new variance ratio tests: The Lo–MacKinlay variance ratio test, the Chow–Denning test, and Wright’s Rank and Sign test. All three tests report that the return does not follow the random walk for the full sample, suggesting the possibility of making gains by exploiting various investing strategies. It was found that both Indian indices follow the random walk hypothesis during the phase of parliamentary elections. This study contributes to the existing literature on the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH).

Suggested Citation

  • Khemraj Alias Sangam Shet & SriRam Padyala & Ramesh Bommadevara, 2023. "Does the random walk hypothesis hold for Indian stock markets during parliamentary elections?," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 13(12), pages 913-922.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:913-922:id:4889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/4889/7750
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:913-922:id:4889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.