IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/adprev/v6y2018i4p226-242id268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maturities and Dynamic Volatility of Sukuk Comparative Study Between a Sukuk and a Conventional Bond Index

Author

Listed:
  • Brahim Roukiane
  • Abdenbi EL Marzouki

Abstract

Throughout this article, we have tried to compare the dynamics of the volatility of the Sukuk index of different maturities, as well as their conventional counterparts, by carrying out several tests, namely the Student test, the Granger causality test, the Jarque Berra test and the Ljung-Box test, so we modeled the behavior of volatility using the unconditional volatility measured by the monthly standard deviation and the conditional volatility estimated by the GARCH models and EGARCH. Our sample consists of ten index selected from the Dow Jones index of different maturities, the study period ranges from 01/01/2014 to 25/04/2017. We concluded that Sukuk are generally less risky than conventional bonds. Indeed, the modeling of the volatility of the return index by the GARCH and EGARCH models shows that the Sukuk index are significantly and largely less volatile than their conventional counterparts for all maturities. As well as the persistence of the volatility of the Sukuk index is more persistent compared to their conventional counterparts, when the maturity exceeds strictly 5 years and vice versa if the maturity is less than 5 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Brahim Roukiane & Abdenbi EL Marzouki, 2018. "Maturities and Dynamic Volatility of Sukuk Comparative Study Between a Sukuk and a Conventional Bond Index," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(4), pages 226-242.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:adprev:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:226-242:id:268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5008/article/view/268/512
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5008/article/view/268/1662
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:adprev:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:226-242:id:268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5008/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.