IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jtsrta/v28y2021i2p105-129id415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Financial Integration Increase Bank Efficiency? New Evidence From the Euro area

Author

Listed:
  • Ehsan Rajabi

Abstract

This paper aims to estimate the relationship between bank's cost and profit efficiency and financial integration, which we defined as five groups of competition, bank market ownership, financial liberalization, free capital flow, and the euro area control variables. A two-step quantitative research design was employed to accomplish purpose of the current paper for an unbalanced pooled time series dataset of 126 banks of the euro area banking system between 1999 and 2012 : Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and panel regression analysis (GMM regression model). The results suggest that concentration ratio, foreign ownership, domestic credit, and market integration are negatively related to bank's cost and profit efficiency while the coefficient of real credit growth and capital flow have a positive relationship to cost and profit efficiency score. Furthermore, empirical findings of bank market power, government budget deficit targeting, and public debt targeting are consistent in both cost and profit efficiency models. Therefore, the government budget deficit has a positive impact on cost efficiency without assurance of sound public finance policy which is important to ensure sustainable economic development within the euro area. criteria relating to government deficit needs to adjustment for the euro area adopted Member States because, by increasing the difference of actual from targeted value of government budget deficit; bank cost efficiency will be increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Ehsan Rajabi, 2021. "Does Financial Integration Increase Bank Efficiency? New Evidence From the Euro area," Journal Transition Studies Review, Transition Academia Press, vol. 28(2), pages 105-129.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:105-129:id:415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/article/view/415/262
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Transition Studies Review
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:105-129:id:415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.