IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jtsrta/v27y2020i2p69-82id325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discourse Study in the Postmodern Feminist International Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Meijiao

Abstract

The development of the theory of international relations has gone through several major changes, of which the most important one is the linguistic turn, and the struggle for and construction of discourse power is an important feature or proposition in the postmodern feminist theory. Language is no longer just the meaning of discourse and text, but essentially reflects a power transfer, discourse also means power, and language bears the carrier of power. Whoever has mastered the right to “speak” has the right to construct the behavior pattern. Postmodern feminist international relations theory is based on deconstruction, existentialism, anti-essentialism and anti-universalism. It advocates individual differences, marginal women’s demands and the mobility of subjectivity, which all reflect the diversity and flexibility of international political development. In order to fully understand the complete picture of international relations, we have retrieved the gender in the international community. This exploration can not only make us understand the important position of discourse in the postmodern feminist international relations theory more clearly, but also help scholars find a feasible path for the construction of feminist international relations theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Meijiao, 2020. "Discourse Study in the Postmodern Feminist International Relations," Journal Transition Studies Review, Transition Academia Press, vol. 27(2), pages 69-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:69-82:id:325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/article/view/325/218
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Transition Studies Review
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:69-82:id:325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.